Why Quantitative?

 Some rights reserved by Ken Whytock

This week I've been thinking a lot about how to actual see where we are in our learning journey.  I know that many schools have a focus on quantitative data.  We use standardised tests to make sure we are learning at the right time. We focus a lot on quantitative data because it is easier to show a big picture with lots of data at the same time (I think anyway). 

So, how can we present more personal qualitative data to parents.  Right now we are entering conference time, and we want to share the stories and make it personal, so I wonder how our teachers are doing that, and what the parents are thinking. 

I was reading this article about Modern Learning and wonder how we can use qualitative data more effectively.  We can use it to paint a bigger picture and a more complete story, but how do we use it to enhance our teaching practice.  How do we use it to drive inquiry? 

Way too many questions this week. 

Shaping our class

 Some rights reserved by Matt Stratton

I was just talking to one of my colleagues about this lately.  How can we shape our classroom, and our classroom culture differently.  

I was mentioning Lakoff, and how metaphors help shape our reality.  Today reading Creating Cultures of Thinking I came across the same idea.  Often we refer to school as work, especially for students.  How does this shape how they go about their day? 

I remember Sir Ken Robinson talking about teachers as gardeners. 

How powerful can we be if we start changing our metaphors? How do we start this? 

When we think about vision of a school and the places we want to go, we don't often address how we shape our school through language.   When we think about brands and story telling and the whole image of school, we as teachers need to start shaping it through our daily interactions, the metaphors we create and the language we use. 

I'm not sure gardening is the best metaphor (although it fits nicely with my environmental beliefs) but the idea that growth is always possible and that there are seasons of better growth really resonates with me (actually now I wonder if this is something we have to differentiate as well). 

Diving into a new year

 Some rights reserved by AdamCohn

I'm pretty excited about this new year.  A lot of things will be going on.  Some of my grade three teachers will be going one to one with ipads, really going to focus on cognitive coaching with (so far) six teachers (I'm hoping to build on that) and bringing a new fishbowl type model of PD to school. 

All of this goes towards a more personalized style of development.  At times I wonder about how beneficial or damaging personalized learning can be.  I guess it's important not to totally enable enable a learner to dictate everything, but rather create situations where as individuals they can succeed.  Specifically I'm thinking about teachers, and how we need to engage them where they need it most, without offering overly involved amounts of people. 

Hopefully our fishbowl model will address these issues, smaller groups focused on things they need to know (school directed) but build up relationships so we can work on what the teachers want to know and hopefully add in some cognitive coaching as well. 

I start seeing new teachers next week, looking forward to seeing the new teachers and reuniting with the old.  

Using questions to dig deeper

This is the second year I've done this particular "sharing the planet unit" with grade 1 students.  Last year the focus (their focus, not mine) was on butterflies, we had seen a lot.  This year, we are focusing a lot on millipedes.   Through questioning we are able to help the students use online resources to identify and figure out what these living things are about. 

I want to start changing (drastically at times) how my questioning skills can dig deep fast.  I've been working all year on structuring questions, my co-teachers think it's a natural skill of mine, but I've worked very hard on it.  However, I'm not yet where I want to be. 

I've been reading coaching books to help develop questions that will make my teachers more effective, and I'm hoping I can transfer these questions, or these questioning techniques to students.  How can we go deep fast though? Is it possible, recommended? 

These are the thoughts that are running through me right now.  How do I become the most effective questioner? 

Why so slow?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/befuddledsenses/

The end of the year is quickly approaching, and this is a time I find when teachers are definitely trying to speed things up.  We want to get all of the content in before the students go to their next great, before they try to get things presentable to parents, and before we rush off to our summer vacations.

At our school at least half of the grade levels I work with are finishing the year with sharing the planet, so I'm pushing for a go slow movement for the next six or seven weeks.  We need time to fully experience what it's like outside in order to actually make those connections (something I feel I talk about all the time).   I now have four classes I take outside every week.  It's a start (one class is trying to move to everyday next year), but we are moving forward which is great!

We are taking the time to wonder and think, something that is difficult for some teachers.  We have to talk about connections and thinking deeply about how things work together (which is the central idea for most of our units, but never really adressed this way).

All in all, in just one week I've seen more excitement about the unit. Students are actively engaged and posing good questions.  This week we are trying to "look closely" to see how things work and what things look like.

Going slow is great for us right now, hopefully I can convince some teachers to keep it up after these seven weeks.

Collaborating

 Some rights reserved by familymwr

Since the holiday things have been full on, exciting, but busy.  We want to move more towards a fish bowl model of professional development at our school. We've put in our proposal and are waiting for our chance to talk with administration. 

Right after though, I applied for a job as an Open Minds Coordinator.  During the interview I was able to talk more about the fish bowl concept and what I wanted to do with it, as I was talking this whole new idea unfolded, who do I actually collaborate with, and how do I collaborate with them.  Often I feel I just talk to my fellow Digital Literacy Coaches, sometimes teachers, sometimes STEAM, but not as many people as I should.  

The goal now is to take over the library, with the Digital Literacy Coaches (I don't think Open Minds is for me), bring in the Librarians, the STEAM people, the Open Minds people and other Learning Leaders at school.  Then do all of our PD.  We have people who are experts in areas constantly offering PD, sharing expertise with the other experts so we can all present, and then people book out specific coaches for individual needs based on individual goals. 

I'm very excited.

What is Nature Smart

 Some rights reserved by FotoGrazio

Just had an interesting conversation with a grade 5 teacher about "nature smart". 

He wasn't totally convinced that multiple intelligences were something we should be teaching towards, specifically with nature smart ideas. 

I fully understand that encouraging people to develop growth mindsets can get them out of a box of learning a specific way and not just focusing on their strengths. The conversation which really got me though was, what was nature smart? 

In the book he was looking at it said something like liking animals as a basis, his question (and rightly) was who doesn't like animals? Does that really make you nature smart. 

I started talking about the ability to see things in systems, not really sure if that's nature smart, but looking at connections between animals, and creating empathy that kind of thing. But wasn't really sure. 

So this week will be digging a little deeper into my ecoliteracy book, trying to convince him about maybe thinking ecoliterate is a little different from nature smart, we'll see. 

Reflection

 Some rights reserved by Rebirth Cycle

With our grade 3 classes we've been using blogs to reflect what we are learning. More than that though, I am hoping to make our reflections interesting.  Almost all of my students think that reflection is like a recount.  Here's what we learned, this list of things.  I know now this.

It's frustrating, mainly because I want to move away from that kind of learning, but my students obviously still see learning this way.  I try to tell them that let me know what you learned, not what was taught, what's your big take away, why does it matter? 

Then I wonder why or who taught us how to reflect.  I think for my next couple of lessons I'm going to look at some other student blogs and teacher blogs to talk about what's really important about learning. Then go to maybe tumblr or something to show how we are always kind of reflecting.  Maybe some comics, to talk about processing visually, maybe Nicki's Blog to show how we can even think differently. 

School is off for two weeks so I have heaps of time to prepare, but how can we teach students to write interesting reflections, I've used them as the audience, and even they are bored.  So time to inspire I guess. 

Always Learning

 Some rights reserved by Nerds For Nature

Reading George Couros' blog today about being Learning Savvy. In it he was talking about being tech savvy, and how he isn't always comfortable with the term.

As an EdTech coach, people definitely see me as someone who has technology skills (even though I don't necessarily see myself that way). Like George, I want to be more learning savvy.

Part of my action towards this is working on the Cognitive coaching workshops.  I want to be more focused on how we approach learning, with a tech and environmental ed perspective, but the goal is the same, what is best for students' learning.

Through my project on community, we have just finished our stories, and some of our blog entries.  We've talked about our favourite places and people in hopes that we can connect with incoming students, to make their transitions a little easier. It's not really about the tools we used, it's about what we learned about ourselves, our favourite spots, and how we can improve our community.

How disruptive is silence?

 Some rights reserved by jsdilag

Just returned from a course on Cognitive Coaching with Bill and Ochan Powell where we talked about the power of listening, and being uncomfortable can be to our learning.

One of the things I started last year (and Bill and Ochan mentioned at the workshop) was the idea that as teachers, we don't really teach listening.  Well maybe some teachers do, but things like looking at a person, focusing, and keeping eye contact doesn't really mean listening to me.  I think listening means being able to summarize the thoughts of another, and make connections (without the purpose of summarizing or making connections).  I don't know, I find it hard to fully describe (probably because I was never really taught).  Listening can be powerful, in this course we spent a lot of time listening, to each other, our instructors and ourselves, and honestly, I learned a lot. Mostly because I was quiet. This was incredibly difficult for me, I'm almost always trying to make connections to what people are thinking, and stopping myself from talking was something I had to learn. 

The point is, I think anyway, that making myself uncomfortable, really improved my learning.  Putting myself in a new situation, really trying to figure out someone else's point of view, helped me learn more about them and myself. 

Since my main wondering are with technology and the environment,  I wonder how we can incorporate silence into our learning with technology.  So often we use our tech to distract us from the silence and those uncomfortable moments.  This, I feel, takes us away from those deeper learning opportunities. 

As teachers who use technology how do we initiate and establish those silence moments with a device, first in ourselves and then in our students? How can we make listening (active listening, or reading) a habit online rather than just consuming? 

Final Project - Making Connections

 Some rights reserved by Khánh Hmoong

I really want students to start thinking about how to make positive connections online, and then transfer those feelings into the "real" world.  I think that if we start fostering a connection before students transition into a new school we can make friendships more meaningful before students come.  We can also make deeper connections to other schools who may not be ever coming to see us.

I'm going to start this project in the new year with the grade 3 class studying migration ( I just checked my first UbD for Coetail and it was also about migration, funny huh?).




The important bit for me is making the emotional connection, the product and most of the process will be student led (I hope) because we are working on empathy and connectivism.

Here's hoping anyway, let me know if you have any ideas.

They're just getting started

Really thinking about the classroom as a learning space today and was reminded of this video of +Jeff Utecht



I especially like the Jack and Jack part around 12:50.

How do we interact with students who are doing more than us, what do we do to shape this learning?

Excited to work with teachers on this and explore together in the upcoming weeks.

Can phenomenology be online?

The Lived Experience 

 Some rights reserved by ditchthattextbook

Phenomenology is the idea of making meaning from your lived experiences (basically). During my master's research I used this methodology to dig deeper into my understanding of what it meant to be an environmental educator. As a teacher, I believe in the idea of constructivism, and making meanings based on your previous experiences. So much of learning for me is experiential based, we learn by doing, and reflecting on our actions (either in groups or on our own).  With this idea of knowledge as being, I wonder a lot about gamification in the classroom.

What's Real? 

My main questions when thinking about gamification or anything really online, is what is real? If we learn from our experiences, what is an "actual" experience. I think this video is pretty powerful, and I think it's something we have to think about as educators, especially when we are moving beyond "connections".  So as educators when we are thinking about gamification, we have to think about creating authentic gaming experiences.

Gaming versus Gamification 

 Some rights reserved by Cea.

Frustrations first, earlier this year we had a math website rep come to our school and talk about how their website gamified education, we had a lms platform come in saying they gamified learning.  They did this through badges and scores.  It totally put me off.  Badges, scores, etc. don't make a game.  A real purpose or challenge makes a game. Through this real purpose you can have opportunities to level up, or earn points but clicking a button to "practice" math skills is not a game. It's clicking a button (that has no real learning value).

I struggle with gamification, because I don't think I like the term.  Apple uses challenge based learning, PYP uses their performance task to illuminate their central idea, and using pedagogy like this to engage your class can create a game like atmosphere.  Setting challenges for students to complete before they meet the next challenge is more what I think of when I think of gamification.  

I loved the minecraft history project video. No where was the teacher trying to create a game like atmosphere. There was a question posed (create a sustainable city) and different ways to reach that goal. I personally have a hard time imaging someone doing a more in-depth job than the student who used Minecraft, but I'm not sure using Minecraft on it's own would've gamified the situation. 

In the "Raising Engagement in e-learning through gamification" there is an emphasis on fast feedback that I believe is crucial.  In games you quickly get a sense if you're winning and losing.  Using connectivism to interact with other people can help you correct your actions.  This formative assessment is crucial for engaged learners. 

One of the quotations from this week that resonated deeply with me was:

"It's not about the technology; it is about new ways of thinking. The barriers are in our heads," Harrison says. "Learning is not about content, it is about creation. Isn't that our job: to help kids learn how to do things? Our job is to prepare children for the world that exists." - Nick Morrison

We need to change how we think about learning, not just gamify something. We need to encourage students to create and engage in their learning, not just consume by clicking buttons.  A program or an app can't do this. Teachers need to do this, and I think creating authentic learning experiences (online or otherwise) is the most difficult part: however, it's likely the most important part. 

Integrating to enhance

 Some rights reserved by chris.chabot

I think we read the old things in old ways article in Course 1.  This article resonated with me (and my frustrations as an EdTech Coach) because often we find something that works, and we just stick with it. A colleague sent me this image and I think it resonates with how I feel at times.

http://hakanforss.wordpress.com/page/2/

This blog is actually really interesting.  Too often we feel like we are too busy to "add on" new ideas and as a result we keep doing the same thing poorly. We can then switch to new things in old ways, and both the coach and the teacher still feel the frustration.

I really like this quotation from edutopia:

Integrating technology into classroom instruction means more than teaching basic computer skills and software programs in a separate computer class. Effective tech integration must happen across the curriculum in ways that research shows deepen and enhance the learning process. link

We need to integrate to enhance learning (and independence), not integrate for the sake of integration.  To do this, I do believe we need a framework (like most things without a framework we lack direction or purpose which makes it difficult to do anything).

I do like SAMR, and have taken a course with Punya Mishra on TPACK in Singapore last year. I like the openness of TPACK and the linear structure of SAMR, I find SAMR much easier to explain to teachers because of ladder images or linear images.

 Some rights reserved by tim.klapdor

I'm no longer teaching, so I can't comment on my integration in the classroom all the time. But I do use the idea of enhancing education as the backbone of my work.  We use all kinds of technology (like wood and nails, to ipads and phones, to paper and pencil) and I work with teachers at making sure the learning is at the centre of what we do. 

Sharing ideas through video

This has been an incredibly busy week, but I am trying to focus on making one blog post a week and this week I've been thinking a lot about training, and sharing and how amazing video is at this.

 Some rights reserved by Brian Metcalfe

This week I've created two videos for training purposes for my teachers.  Recently I've had to go to four or five classes and set certain things up.  While I love spending my time with teachers, I really want my job as EdTech Coach to be focused on learning conversations.  In order to liberate some of my setting up with teachers time I've made videos and shared them with teachers, this way they always have access and they can learn at their own time (and not have to ask me which I think some people try to just coast along until we realize that they aren't doing what's expected).  The videos have been easy to make using Camtasia2 my coworkers use another program, but I think this is pretty easy to use. 

I've been in a number of classes this week working with students making videos.  I just returned from one class that is working on documenting the systems they use.  The students take a video of the system they want to talk about and then use Explain Everything to narrate. 

The quotation above is great, we need students to be making videos (especially the younger students) to fully understand what they know and honour how they can explain it.  It empowers the students to share their knowledge in any way possible. 

This week in the #enviroed chat we've been talking about nature and technology and Ranger Ridley led me to this link regarding crowd sourcing natural understandings. It's amazing how videos (and photos) can lead others to see what new natural things are occurring, and what is happening to our natural systems. 

My focus on the next couple of weeks will be bringing video into more of my lessons, and hopefully in more of my teacher professional development.

Thinking about coaching

 Some rights reserved by jenhegna1

I've been thinking a lot about coaching (what it means to be an Edtech coach, a learning coach, a sports coach, are they different?) this week.  Mostly in relating to professional development for teachers.  I think a lot of us know where we want to be, or what we want to do, we just need someone there to help us get there, and make sure we're doing it while following our school's vision. 

One of the best things about life is change, and my job is constantly evolving.  In order to keep up with this, I need heaps of PD, and I'm reading as much as I can.  Currently I'm reading this book. 

amazon.com

I'm trying not to think of myself as "just" an Edtech Coach, but as a learning coach. While I don't have the whole skill set yet, it's something I'm working on. 

One of the most important concepts that this book made me reflect on, and I use in my EdTech job is the importance of trust.  Moving to a new school means the first thing I have to do is build those relationships with teachers.  I'm going to a lot of meetings, listening and supporting, and finding out what they think should be happening.  By listening and then acting, I'm hoping that the teachers will know that I have their backs when they want to try something, so that when I want to encourage them to go somewhere new in their learning journey, they'll know I support them. 

 Some rights reserved by torbakhopper

I think it all goes back to the sense of community and connection.  If we all feel like we are connected, and we are trying to do the best for learning (students' and ours) then we need to be open to some direction.  Any kind of peer coaching can be helpful.  

Getting into classes this week was amazing. So good to see happy kids, and inspired teachers doing their best. We're starting individual student blogs in the next couple of weeks, working on class blogs and storytelling apps this week. All in all an exciting time to be working with teachers.